Friday, May 15, 2009

Is the Death Penalty really the Way to Go?

A few of my classmates has recently put in a blog covering the death penalty. One of them is by Nayaram whose blog could be visited at Texas, O Texas. In the beginning she gives a quote from the Jamail Center for Legal Research. By paraphrasing, the quote states that Texas district courts would have original jurisdiction for all criminal felony cases. The State could decide to give an individual the punishment of death, if they are convicted of a capital felony. In order to reach a capital felony, one would have to “intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual,” under special circumstances.”

Nayaram then gives reasons to abject this statement by sharing her opinions on the matter. She feels that the death penalty “is an easy way out of the problem for not only the government, but also, the person that committed the crime.” Nayaram also understands the reasons to have the death penalty. One example is the expenses to harbor a prisoner. She is absolutely right. According a PBS article, the average yearly cost per prisoner in the U.S. in 2001 was $22,650. Regardless of facts, she believes that freeing inmates “from a lifetime of guilt and suffering in a small cell isn’t justice. Sentencing them to a lifetime in prison has far more penalizing repercussions.” I could understand her reasoning and agree with the no death penalty, but I might look at it differently.

To fix the problem, Nayaram suggested concentrating on repairing the problems now. She says, “If we work on improving the stability of their [inmates] psyche, making them mentally healthy, it will prevent problems from arising later, whether it is them, their children, or their grandchildren.” There are jails where inmates could decide to come in for rehabilitation. This is a long term commitant that ask them to retell their crime among peers. In the end of the rehabilitation process, the inmate visits the victim’s family. I believe that there should not only be an rehabilitation for inmates, but we should also focus on rehabilitating the victim’s families. More specifically we need to learn how to heal through reconciliation, forgiveness.

There was an interesting article called “An Argument Against Allowing the Families of Murder Victims to View Executions,” by Michael Lawrence Goodwin. He says that families generally give one or two reasons to attend an execution. One is to have an opportunity for closure. Other family members may view their presence in the execution chamber as a final opportunity to represent their murdered family member in the criminal justice process. Does viewing the execution really heal or does it make it worst? No matter what I don’t believe one could simple have closure with a violate loss of a love one. However, there is a different between carrying the burden with you to allowing the burden to consume you. This article is a fairly easy read with real quotes from people that has live through it. The quote that jumped out at me was to the second general reason to view the execution. One mother said, “It’s the last thing we can do for the girls…It’s not going to be easy, but it may help us,” as she prepares to watch the execution of her daughter’s killer.

I can’t help, but to make a connection from this quote to another. They said that “Healing has to be bigger and better than reducing ourselves to participating in gruesome acts.” This was by Brooks Douglass who had a sense of satisfaction after meeting with George Ake, the other man convicted of killing his parents. I agree with his statement though. If you do something, do it all the way and don’t just stop for less. Like me writing this blog. Man… I am way over due with this. I already have what I need to get a good grade (I hope). Now I’m just slowly torturing the people who are foolish enough to continue to read this. Hahaha Well, all I’m saying is that forgiveness is a powerful thing. Not a lot of people can do it. I can only imagine how big a burden it would be if it where to fall on my shoulders. I'm still blessed to have all my grandparents along with the rest of REALLY BIG family. If we execution the inmate before we give them a chance to decide to go into rehabilitation, then that visit between the killer and the victim’s family will never happen. The memory of the love one is too great to end it with a bloody act.

I’ll end it with a powerful story… Step by Step A Jounrey of Hope: Marietta Jaeger

1 comment:

  1. Is the death penalty closure? Of course.
    Dudley Sharp, contact info below

    For those who have lost loved ones to murder, the execution of the murderer definitely brings closure.

    The execution is closure to the legal process, whereby execution is the most just sanction available for the crime and the family is relieved that the murderer is dead and can no longer harm another innocent - a very big deal.

    The confusion with "closure" is when some imply that execution can bring psychological or emotional closure to the devastation suffered by the murder victim's loved ones.

    I know of no victim survivor who believes that execution could bring that type of closure. How could it? No punishment can, nor is that the intention.

    The concept of emotional "closure" via execution is, often, a fantasy perpetrated by anti death penalty folks, just so they can denounce it, with a talking point, as in: "Those supporting capital punishment claim that closure is a major reason to support the death penalty - but there is no closure."

    Do you know of any murder victim survivor who says that their emotional or psychological pain was closed once the murderer was executed? Me neither.

    Murder victim "Mary Bounds' daughter, Jena Watson, who watched the execution, said Berry's action deprived the family of a mother, a grandmother and a friend, and that pain will never go away."

    "We feel that we have received justice," she said Wednesday after the execution. "There's never an end to the hurt from a violent crime. There can never fully be closure. You have to learn to do the best you can. Tonight brings finality to a lot of emotional issues."

    Ina Prechtl, who lost her daughter Felecia Prechtl. to a rape /murder said, after watching Karl Chamberlain executed: "One question I ask myself every day, why does it take so long for justice to be served?" It took 17 years for the execution. ("Texas executes 1st inmate since injection lull", 6/11/2008, MICHAEL GRACZYK, Associated Press Writer, HUNTSVILLE, Texas)

    copyright 2009 Dudley Sharp, Permission for distribution of this document, in whole or in part, is approved with proper attribution.

    Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters
    e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com, 713-622-5491,
    Houston, Texas

    Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS , VOA and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.

    A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.

    Pro death penalty sites

    essays http://homicidesurvivors.com/categories/Dudley%20Sharp%20-%20Justice%20Matters.aspx

    http://www.dpinfo.com
    http://www.cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm http://www.clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm
    http://www.coastda.com/archives.html http://www.lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm http://www.prodeathpenalty.com http://yesdeathpenalty.googlepages.com/home2 (Sweden)
    http://www.wesleylowe.com/cp.html

    ReplyDelete